Talk:Main Page

From LOLCat Bible Translation Project

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 14: Line 14:
One question: How difficult is it to have some "rate this page" feature (e.g. like on youtube) in the wiki?  This could give some feedback which style is considered as fun by most of the people.  --[[User:Landei|Landei]]
One question: How difficult is it to have some "rate this page" feature (e.g. like on youtube) in the wiki?  This could give some feedback which style is considered as fun by most of the people.  --[[User:Landei|Landei]]
:Ouch. Yes. That actually would be a great idea. I noticed some pages are absolutely awesome translations. Some pages are really poor translations but still funny. Some are done with translation software. Ideally, I want to see funny and somewhat accurate. The concepts should be intact, but the text should be garbled. --[[User:WikiAdmin|Zotnix]] 11:46, 9 October 2007 (EDT)
:Ouch. Yes. That actually would be a great idea. I noticed some pages are absolutely awesome translations. Some pages are really poor translations but still funny. Some are done with translation software. Ideally, I want to see funny and somewhat accurate. The concepts should be intact, but the text should be garbled. --[[User:WikiAdmin|Zotnix]] 11:46, 9 October 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
Hi, I'm new to the project, and I'm looking to do some major work. Just so I don't conflict with anyone, I have two questions: what sections are no one working on for sure, and also- what bible are we using? King James? New English? I don't know the rest. If you're not picky, I'll just use whichever one I buy when I go to a used bookstore today. Thanks, and BAI! [[User:Sexdeathrobots|Sexdeathrobots]] 16:59, 9 October 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 20:59, 9 October 2007

Can you change the name of this page to "Holy Bible" or something?--Jesus 20:51, 30 July 2007 (EDT)

Yep, by moving the page to Holy Bible and changing MediaWiki:Mainpage to reflect that Gracenotes 18:50, 12 August 2007 (EDT)

Exactly how many people are working on this?--Jesus 07:54, 1 August 2007 (EDT)

Not too many yet. Three heavy contributors plus a few misc. people. I just started the site about 10 days ago, so I'm surprised at how much stuff has been done in that short amount of time. --Zotnix 08:30, 1 August 2007 (EDT)


So, are we doing my template and the bottom bar or what's the deal with that? --Jesus 14:26, 4 August 2007 (EDT)

Comment about extensions: installing ParserFunctions and CategoryTree would be, imho, useful for this project. ParserFunctions would help because it can parse expressions, check if pages exist, etc., useful for the bottom template. CategoryTree seems helpful because organization here looks heavily category-based. Just my opinion, tho Gracenotes 18:50, 12 August 2007 (EDT)

One question: How difficult is it to have some "rate this page" feature (e.g. like on youtube) in the wiki? This could give some feedback which style is considered as fun by most of the people. --Landei

Ouch. Yes. That actually would be a great idea. I noticed some pages are absolutely awesome translations. Some pages are really poor translations but still funny. Some are done with translation software. Ideally, I want to see funny and somewhat accurate. The concepts should be intact, but the text should be garbled. --Zotnix 11:46, 9 October 2007 (EDT)

Hi, I'm new to the project, and I'm looking to do some major work. Just so I don't conflict with anyone, I have two questions: what sections are no one working on for sure, and also- what bible are we using? King James? New English? I don't know the rest. If you're not picky, I'll just use whichever one I buy when I go to a used bookstore today. Thanks, and BAI! Sexdeathrobots 16:59, 9 October 2007 (EDT)

Personal tools